From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.xora.org.uk ([80.68.91.202] helo=xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsrmI-0003UJ-2m for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:35:35 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D41BA6014 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 07:34:55 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cfZMvNDFwrB8 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 07:34:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.119] (188-220-34-37.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.34.37]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6647A6013 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 07:34:48 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C85DC92.2070002@xora.org.uk> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 07:32:50 +0100 From: Graeme Gregory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1283775540-13164-1-git-send-email-noor_ahsan@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.68.91.202 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dp@xora.org.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] libsdl-native: Convert to new style staging, remove do_stage X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:35:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/09/10 07:32, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/9/7 Graham Gower : >> On 6 September 2010 21:49, Noor Ahsan wrote: >>> * Remove do_stage () >>> * Replace tabs with 8 spaces in do_configure >> I see that spaces and not tabs are the OE policy, but I can't lay my >> eyes on anything that says how many spaces are preferred. I see a lot >> of recipes and examples using 4 space indentation (and most others use >> a tab). Is this something that people care about? >> >> -Graham >> >> PS: Personally I'm a tab man, not a spaceman. > Afaik it is not defined. > There is http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Styleguide > which only says "# > # Use spaces for indentation as developers tends to use different > amount of spaces per one tab. " > now we're just using a different amount of spaces :-) > > (actually using different # of spaces for a tab is not that bad as > long as you stick to tabs only. That is why the linux kernel requires > indentig by tabs). > > Frans (who also likes tabs, if only because it is the default in vi > with autoindent (and yeah, I know you can change that)) > Informally the policy has always been we dont care tabs or spaces as long as its consistent within the same recipe. Graeme