From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marius_Gr=F6ger?= <marius.groeger@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Interlace modes with r600 KMS
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:07:31 +0200
Message-ID: <4C869B83.3010507@googlemail.com>
References: <4C85EC2B.6050100@googlemail.com>	<AANLkTinr=HV5T5qah3sn4MsHxMbN74HZFbkrdDSFVrri@mail.gmail.com>	<4C865D4C.30703@googlemail.com>	<AANLkTikerfovnOJ+7bAR4mbwNPMsVAJuRzeKoLpXTSb9@mail.gmail.com>	<4C867F1D.2090501@googlemail.com>
	<AANLkTin-L9TVryDxKHJyAB4a7Bpq3Ui2Pa=rOz9A5XwH@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ew0-f49.google.com (mail-ew0-f49.google.com
	[209.85.215.49])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DD59EBBF
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue,  7 Sep 2010 13:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so2973868ewy.36
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin-L9TVryDxKHJyAB4a7Bpq3Ui2Pa=rOz9A5XwH@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

Am 07.09.2010 21:00, schrieb Alex Deucher:
> Does this patch help?

No change...

> If not, does it work ok with ums (boot with radeon.modeset=0)?  If so,
> we'll need to compare the modesetting paths between ums and kms and
> see what got broken with kms.

Without KMS the interlaced modes are listed in xrandr right away, and 
they are working!

Marius