From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [linux test] 2090: regressions - FAIL Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:28:14 +1000 Message-ID: <4C87572E.2000508@goop.org> References: <4C85FE60.1020001@goop.org> <19590.10048.28219.562217@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19590.10048.28219.562217@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/07/2010 09:51 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux test] 2090: regressions - FAIL"): >> Hm, looks like I managed to break 32-bit with the ballooning changes. >> Though I tested 32-bit PV domU, but perhaps I broke 32-bit dom0? > Oops. Should be fixed now. J