From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1OtMNh-000446-Mm for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:16:13 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43077 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OtMNf-00043F-Ju for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:16:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtMNe-0000Ec-EE for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:16:11 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:33484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtMNe-0000EN-9B for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:16:10 -0400 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so165313fxm.0 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:16:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=sKK0/Ivgs8/C2xqHQ0Mg9tqnwu9pjyLI0fytUGG5EdI=; b=l5VASWmMlAs94qdYWGV2Fq3NMDBS2AoiaYswU6CX+l5Xng9ws7OSGYE5OqOHziie2Z XGGqhRpoIgOdYBCfzpTgfVUmt3lewbJYX8dOqGoSj7YE0xoMNx6MC+n/bccStecxxWTB MaKLRLEz0lASAogCSMLD2hsgdPvstOjSOkT4s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=Gb1tASPyA0US9ZDiVBcU6eOf1vsPJP1IrDuIhDWLCyZ9i+guw+U8+N8OVbYuDRsgGZ 0WsHSYMy+6uF1pBHtSrQwC1CeUwIPTZrNiMWjLEap32XwvHr05pteAwfG3zc0Jxoawba rELSwO1dshyEFTtC37Kfw3fdLefDcm9yR7n4s= Received: by 10.223.105.76 with SMTP id s12mr146524fao.107.1283958968587; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.bg45.phnet (224-225.62-81.cust.bluewin.ch [81.62.225.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b9sm94645faq.7.2010.09.08.08.16.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C87A8AE.8020805@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:15:58 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100805 Icedove/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grub-devel@gnu.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig91E23B8A6F19A706D786D6A9" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: [PATCH] grub-mkconfig patch for MINIX X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:16:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig91E23B8A6F19A706D786D6A9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/15/2010 12:59 PM, Fam Zheng wrote: > Hi, > > `os-prober` was not able to detect recent MINIX installations, so we > patched for the new detection and sent the patch to Debian, it's found = at: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/08/msg00282.html > > MINIX is now able to be Multibooted besides chainloading, so it's > necessary to handle the result of os-prober accordingly. The patch for > GRUB 2 is made then, to generate a Multiboot menu entry when detected > system type is "minix". > > Patch content: > > =3D=3D=3D modified file 'util/grub.d/30_os-prober.in ' > --- util/grub.d/30_os-prober.in 2010-07-04 > 22:45:14 +0000 > +++ util/grub.d/30_os-prober.in 2010-08-13 > 11:31:07 +0000 > @@ -197,6 +197,23 @@ > } > EOF > ;; > + minix) > + case ${LONGNAME} in > + Minix*) Why do you need to check LONGNAME separately? This shouldn't be necessary= =2E > + cat << EOF > +menuentry "${LONGNAME} (on ${DEVICE}, Multiboot)" { > +EOF > + save_default_entry | sed -e "s/^/\t/" > + prepare_grub_to_access_device ${DEVICE} | sed -e "s/^/\t/" > + cat << EOF > + multiboot /boot/image_latest is it always named like this? Is /boot never a mountpoint? > +} > +EOF > + ;; > + *) > + echo " ${LONGNAME}(multiboot) is not yet supported" >&2 > + esac > + ;; > *) > echo " ${LONGNAME} is not yet supported by grub-mkconfig." >&2 > ;; > > > --=20 > Best Regards! > Fam Zheng > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel > =20 --=20 Regards Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko --------------enig91E23B8A6F19A706D786D6A9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREKAAYFAkyHqK4ACgkQNak7dOguQgkZugD+K0sANK0A6ppRgvpMDL5CtF+u js1qaE8G/pdpoJq766MA/04Uka5hBMvBkYEujfB4ZkPMu6BLDY9DRf43HCOe9KXg =+2KE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig91E23B8A6F19A706D786D6A9--