From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Large scancode handling Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:23:42 -0300 Message-ID: <4C87AA7E.60200@redhat.com> References: <20100908073233.32365.74621.stgit@hammer.corenet.prv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41473 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750873Ab0IHPX7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:23:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100908073233.32365.74621.stgit@hammer.corenet.prv> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Linux Input , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Jarod Wilson , Maxim Levitsky , David Hardeman , Jiri Kosina , Ville Syrjala Em 08-09-2010 04:41, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > I guess I better get off my behind and commit the changes to support large > scancodes, or they will not make to 2.6.37 either... There isn't much > changes, except I followed David's suggestion and changed boolean index > field into u8 flags field. Still, please glance it over once again and > shout if you see something you do not like. > > Jiri, how do you want to handle the changes to HID? I could either push > them through my tree together with the first patch or you can push through > yours once the first change hits mainline. > > Mauro, the same question goes for media/IR patch. It seems easier if you apply them on your tree. I'm sure we won't have any major conflicts, if we don't apply the big ir->rc renaming patch. I'll postpone such patch to be applied after the merge upstream. The patches look sane to me. Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cheers, Mauro