From: Kent Borg <kentborg@borg.org>
To: Tor Arvid Lund <torarvid@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Alejandro Riveira Fernández" <ariveira@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: git-p4
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:30:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C8CF231.6090403@borg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinmG5BU+yswWQ8=cRKT5WL_h8vWuUCu2PjZYb87@mail.gmail.com>
Tor Arvid Lund wrote:
> [git-p4: depot-paths = "//Path/To/Your/Project/": change = 30049]
> .. where the 'change' number is the number of the perforce changelist
> you synced using git-p4.
>
> So - work that you want to submit to p4 should be rebased on top of
> such a commit. Then it should work to do git-p4 submit.
>
That doesn't work. I am suspecting there is a tangle in my branches.
Firing up a Python session and manually running the git-p4
findUpstreamBranchPoint() I get back something reminiscent of the commit
I made at your suggestion:
['remotes/p4/master', {'change': '160991', 'depot-paths':
['//depot/imgeng/sw/inferno/kernel/linux-2.6.33-quatro']}]
I thought it looked reasonable, but when I try to run the git p4 summit,
at line 811 in git-p4 it is doing:
git rev-list --no-merges remotes/p4/master..master
And then reversing the results and trying to apply them all, starting
with 1da177e (which is Linux-2.16.12-rc), and again it fails. (Again,
thank goodness it failed at that.) How is git rev-list supposed to get
a limited list back?
Anyone spot my silliness? Next I'm going to see if I can create a
normal (and working) case for comparison. (As a newbie git is one
thing, trying to understand git-p4 at the same time makes it that much
harder.)
Thanks a bunch,
-kb, the Kent who Monday morning (UTC-0400) would love to casually say
"Oh, yes, git-p4 is working great, both directions, no problem.".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-12 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-10 19:54 git-p4 Kent Borg
2010-09-10 21:53 ` git-p4 Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2010-09-11 18:42 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-12 15:30 ` Kent Borg [this message]
2010-09-12 17:22 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-12 17:59 ` git-p4 Kent Borg
2010-09-12 19:54 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-12 20:07 ` git-p4 Kent Borg
2010-09-12 20:12 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-13 14:23 ` git-p4 Kent Borg
2010-09-13 15:01 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-13 16:28 ` git-p4 Kent Borg
2010-09-13 21:58 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-16 12:14 ` git-p4 Kent Borg
2010-09-16 13:54 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-07 13:17 git-p4 dhruva
2008-09-07 13:17 git-p4 dhruva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C8CF231.6090403@borg.org \
--to=kentborg@borg.org \
--cc=ariveira@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torarvid@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.