From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvGVi-0006Au-3n for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:24:23 +0200 Received: (qmail 8025 invoked by uid 1003); 13 Sep 2010 21:23:34 -0000 Received: from pool-96-240-180-126.ronkva.east.verizon.net (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@96.240.180.126) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 13 Sep 2010 21:23:34 -0000 Message-ID: <4C8E9653.2020601@balister.org> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:23:31 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100806 Fedora/3.1.2-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.168.135.169 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philip@balister.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: script to remove orphaned files X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:24:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/13/2010 04:42 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks > wrote: >> As I don't really see progress on this, I am planning to take action >> in a few days. >> Since Khem expressed a preference to keep the files accessible, I'm >> planning not to remove the unneeded patches, but instead move the to >> the obsolete dir. >> (alternate could be to move them to a dir called unused in the recipe dir). >> Removal will be tested by verifying that bitbake -c patch remains >> working on all dirs where unused files are removed. >> > > sometimes same names patches exist in different dirs and if you remove > one then it will start picking the other one > silently so make sure such cases are not there. In general I am wary > of mass changes which could creep in some bugs like that > Ideally I would suggest that you look at each and every change before its final. I agree with Khem. please do this a directory of recipes at a time. Philip > >> Frans. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> > > >