All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Now: Debian issues, WAS: XFS Filesystem not mounting
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:51:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9042D7.90001@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29714426.post@talk.nabble.com>

pbrunnen put forth on 9/14/2010 8:07 PM:

> Always was intrigued by the SGI equipment in the labs when I was at
> University...  Never played with one though.  Checked out the specs of those
> Origin boxes you mention.  That was some horsepower for the time.

Some years ago NCSA was selling off some retired 128P O2K systems really
really cheap.  I was only about 4 hours away from Urbana Champaign at
the time and was really tempted.  I was planning on running _lots_ of
seti@home processes on it, mainly.  ;)

The price was really decent for what I'd be getting, but in the end I
just couldn't justify it, no matter how cool it would have been to have
a dual rack 32P SGI Origin 2000 running in the basement, crunching S@H.

The reality check was that I could build a new 4U quad Xeon box at the
time, of about the same overall performance, and with lots more disk,
for a mere fraction of the cost of the used O2K.  It wouldn't have the
cool SGI badge or run IRIX, but I wouldn't have to add 220v circuits in
the basement, or acquire a big 220v UPS, or pay a much larger monthly
electric bill.

A single socket 12-core 2 GHz Opteron 6100 series on a SuperMicro mobo
with quad DDR3 memory channels w/32 GB RAM, sitting on your desktop,
would simply run circles around that old 2 rack 32P O2K system, probably
5 to 1 or greater in parallel linpack--for less than $2k.

-- 
Stan



_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-15  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-13 23:45 XFS Filesystem not mounting pbrunnen
2010-09-14  1:21 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-14  4:29   ` pbrunnen
2010-09-14  5:40     ` Michael Monnerie
2010-09-14  6:25       ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-09-14 12:32         ` pbrunnen
2010-09-14 14:03           ` Michael Monnerie
2010-09-14 16:09             ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-09-14 16:35               ` pbrunnen
2010-09-14 18:03                 ` Now: Debian issues, WAS: " Stan Hoeppner
2010-09-14 20:32                   ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-09-15  1:07                     ` pbrunnen
2010-09-15  3:51                       ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
2010-09-15 13:15                         ` pbrunnen
2010-09-15  0:44                   ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-15  2:54                     ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-09-15  0:49                   ` pbrunnen
2010-09-14 16:25             ` pbrunnen
2010-09-14  4:43   ` pbrunnen
2010-09-14  5:40     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C9042D7.90001@hardwarefreak.com \
    --to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.