From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ovwbv-0000Ul-C2 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:21:38 +0200 Received: (qmail 20890 invoked by uid 1003); 15 Sep 2010 18:20:45 -0000 Received: from pool-96-240-180-126.ronkva.east.verizon.net (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@96.240.180.126) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 15 Sep 2010 18:20:44 -0000 Message-ID: <4C910E7B.8030601@balister.org> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:20:43 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100907 Fedora/3.1.3-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4C90130C.3040303@gmail.com> <4C90B5E6.1070402@balister.org> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.168.135.169 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philip@balister.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] p4: remove broken and 4 years old recipes. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:21:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/15/2010 02:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Philip Balister wrote: >> On 09/15/2010 02:32 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>> >>> 2010/9/15 Graham Gower: >>>> >>>> Recipes are broken for all architectures except one (probably arm) >>>> because the files in the SRC_URI depend on TARGET_ARCH and the md5/sha256 >>>> are presumably valid only for one of these. >>>> >>>> Anyone wanting perforce should submit new recipes for new perforce >>>> versions. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Graham Gower >>> >>> Agree with the reasoning of Graham, so: >>> >>> Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks >>> >>> Actually I am not too keen on having recipes that just "install" an >>> externally downloaded binary blob >>> (and functionally speaking this does not seem to be something for an >>> embedded system either) >> >> I will have a need for a recipe to install binary blobs (fpga bin files) >> into a file system at some point. So this class recipes are needed. >> > > do you need these m4 recipes ? My comments where of a general nature, not about the specific case. Philip > >> Philip >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> > > >