From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] linux/netback: save interrupt state in add_to_net_schedule_list_tail Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:58:13 -0700 Message-ID: <4C913365.7020107@goop.org> References: <4C8E49B50200007800015BDF@vpn.id2.novell.com> <1284387268.14311.14642.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4C8E53840200007800015C24@vpn.id2.novell.com> <1284455522.14311.16835.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4C8F5C020200007800015F58@vpn.id2.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C8F5C020200007800015F58@vpn.id2.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jan Beulich Cc: Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/14/2010 02:26 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > Nor can I foresee when the pv-ops tree will be reliable enough > and sufficiently functionally complete (without hacks that in > some cases I think are worse than those in the 2.6.18 tree) to > be used as the basis of an enterprise Dom0 (which is the > criteria that could make us finally do the long hoped for switch). > I'd be interested to know what you have in mind here. J