From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: sector size warning at mount time
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:38:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C92641F.7080504@sandeen.net> (raw)
On ppc64 I'm tripping this warning:
if (verbose &&
(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE / BITS_PER_LONG) > sectorsize) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
"XFS: %u byte sectors in use on device %s. "
"This is suboptimal; %u or greater is ideal.\n",
sectorsize, XFS_BUFTARG_NAME(btp),
(unsigned int)PAGE_CACHE_SIZE / BITS_PER_LONG);
}
and it's telling me I should have 1024-byte sectors...
If the kernel is going to complain at mount, should we get it right
at mkfs time? I'm not even quite sure why it's recommending this?
Thanks,
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2010-09-16 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-16 18:38 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-09-16 23:18 ` sector size warning at mount time Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C92641F.7080504@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.