From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwM9j-0000Kd-VK for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:38:14 +0200 Received: from svr-orw-exc-08.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.97]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1OwM8u-0005VP-Jr from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:37:20 -0700 Received: from na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com ([134.86.114.213]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-08.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:37:20 -0700 Received: from [172.30.80.181] ([172.30.80.181]) by na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:37:19 -0600 Message-ID: <4C928DF9.2050405@mentor.com> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:36:57 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4C8E9653.2020601@balister.org> In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Sep 2010 21:37:19.0230 (UTC) FILETIME=[56CD69E0:01CB55E7] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.94.38.131 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Tom_Rini@mentor.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: script to remove orphaned files X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:38:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > The patches I just pushed are tested using bitbake -c patch for all > recipes as far as possible). > (in the recipes I pushed I could not test alsa-scenario_git.bb as it > didn't fetch for me and alsa-driver_0.9.6-hh4c.bb as it was for h3600 > and h3900 only), Not to stop the work here, but is there a reason you couldn't do MACHINE=h3600 bitbake -c patch -b openembedded/recipes/alsa/alsa-driver_0.9.6-hh4c.bb ? Yes, the initial parsing sucks but I think it's important for things like this to go out and find the case where a given recipe is supposed to work and make sure it still works. "It didn't fetch" is a legitimate stopper (and I think candidate for moving to nonworking) of testing something. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation