[refpolicy] [alsa patch (RETRY) 1/1] Common confined users can manage and relabel alsa home files.

[dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/17/2010 08:34 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 09/16/10 11:07, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 09/16/2010 08:49 AM, Dominick Grift wrote:
>>> Unconditional.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dominick Grift<domg472@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> :100644 100644 69aa742... 978edf4... M    policy/modules/admin/alsa.if
>>> :100644 100644 1854002... cfc307b... M    policy/modules/roles/staff.te
>>> :100644 100644 2a19751... c81e389... M    policy/modules/roles/sysadm.te
>>> :100644 100644 9b55b00... 763edf3... M   
>>> policy/modules/roles/unprivuser.te
>>>   policy/modules/admin/alsa.if       |   38
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   policy/modules/roles/staff.te      |    5 ++++
>>>   policy/modules/roles/sysadm.te     |    5 ++++
>>>   policy/modules/roles/unprivuser.te |    5 ++++
>>>   4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/policy/modules/admin/alsa.if b/policy/modules/admin/alsa.if
>>> index 69aa742..978edf4 100644
>>> --- a/policy/modules/admin/alsa.if
>>> +++ b/policy/modules/admin/alsa.if
>>> @@ -126,6 +126,44 @@ interface(`alsa_read_home_files',`
>>>
>>>   ########################################
>>>   ##<summary>
>>> +##    Relabel alsa home files.
>>> +##</summary>
>>> +##<param name="domain">
>>> +##    <summary>
>>> +##    Domain allowed access.
>>> +##    </summary>
>>> +##</param>
>>> +#
>>> +interface(`alsa_relabel_home_files',`
>>> +    gen_require(`
>>> +        type alsa_home_t;
>>> +    ')
>>> +
>>> +    userdom_search_user_home_dirs($1)
>>> +    allow $1 alsa_home_t:file relabel_file_perms;
>>> +')
>>> +
>>> +########################################
>>> +##<summary>
>>> +##    Manage alsa home files.
>>> +##</summary>
>>> +##<param name="domain">
>>> +##    <summary>
>>> +##    Domain allowed access.
>>> +##    </summary>
>>> +##</param>
>>> +#
>>> +interface(`alsa_manage_home_files',`
>>> +    gen_require(`
>>> +        type alsa_home_t;
>>> +    ')
>>> +
>>> +    userdom_search_user_home_dirs($1)
>>> +    allow $1 alsa_home_t:file manage_file_perms;
>>> +')
>>> +
>>> +########################################
>>> +##<summary>
>>>   ##    Read Alsa lib files.
>>>   ##</summary>
>>>   ##<param name="domain">
>>> diff --git a/policy/modules/roles/staff.te
>>> b/policy/modules/roles/staff.te
>>> index 1854002..cfc307b 100644
>>> --- a/policy/modules/roles/staff.te
>>> +++ b/policy/modules/roles/staff.te
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ userdom_unpriv_user_template(staff)
>>>   #
>>>
>>>   optional_policy(`
>>> +    alsa_manage_home_files(staff_t)
>>> +    alsa_relabel_home_files(staff_t)
>>> +')
>>> +
>>> +optional_policy(`
>>>       apache_role(staff_r, staff_t)
>>>   ')
>>>
>>> diff --git a/policy/modules/roles/sysadm.te
>>> b/policy/modules/roles/sysadm.te
>>> index 2a19751..c81e389 100644
>>> --- a/policy/modules/roles/sysadm.te
>>> +++ b/policy/modules/roles/sysadm.te
>>> @@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ tunable_policy(`allow_ptrace',`
>>>   ')
>>>
>>>   optional_policy(`
>>> +    alsa_manage_home_files(sysadm_t)
>>> +    alsa_relabel_home_files(sysadm_t)
>>> +')
>>> +
>>> +optional_policy(`
>>>       amanda_run_recover(sysadm_t, sysadm_r)
>>>   ')
>>>
>>> diff --git a/policy/modules/roles/unprivuser.te
>>> b/policy/modules/roles/unprivuser.te
>>> index 9b55b00..763edf3 100644
>>> --- a/policy/modules/roles/unprivuser.te
>>> +++ b/policy/modules/roles/unprivuser.te
>>> @@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ role user_r;
>>>   userdom_unpriv_user_template(user)
>>>
>>>   optional_policy(`
>>> +    alsa_manage_home_files(user_t)
>>> +    alsa_relabel_home_files(user_t)
>>> +')
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to put these in>   userdom_unpriv_user_template
> 
> If you wanted to cover all three roles, userdom_common_user_template()
> would be the one to use.
> 
I believe sysadm_t can already do this anyways.  But I don't like
sysadm_t being used as a standard login domain.  I guess I don't like it
at all...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyTaGoACgkQrlYvE4MpobNC5gCgjwqk+Fo1M+rFHhoELLze2XuM
cIUAoOYHK594t0wmudQJIlLOLr2fAbVj
=upHg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----