From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: handle ACPI0007 Device in acpi_early_set_pdc
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:37:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C93B561.2040902@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009170756.53100.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
On 09/17/2010 06:56 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Friday, September 17, 2010 01:21:56 am Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 09/13/2010 10:28 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Friday, September 10, 2010 08:06:26 pm Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> I timed the original on a 64-CPU box where the namespace walk cost
>>> should be relatively high, and the walk you added takes about 0.01
>>> seconds. The one already there took about 0.03 seconds, so neither
>>> costs very much.
>>>
>>> And I don't like the fact that the patch below changes the ACPI CA
>>> and it only partly implements acpi_get_devices(), since it ignores
>>> _CID and _STA.
>>
>> please check this one. it still keep _STA etc.
>
> I think you missed this line in my previous response:
>
>>> But I do see your point, and having seen the patch
>>> below, I prefer the original one-line version.
>
> The patch below is better, because it doesn't reimplement quite
> so much stuff, but it still changes the CA,
not sure.
> and I think the end
> result is still quite confusing to read.
yeah, it is confusing to read.... callback with callback.
>
> So I still prefer the original one-line version.
ok, Will resend out original one with updated changelog.
Yinghai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-17 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-10 1:56 [PATCH] acpi: handle ACPI0007 Device in acpi_early_set_pdc Yinghai Lu
2010-09-10 18:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-09-10 19:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-10 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-11 2:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-13 17:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-09-17 7:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-17 13:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-09-17 18:37 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-09-18 6:26 ` [PATCH -v4] acpi: Handle " Yinghai Lu
2010-10-01 6:07 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C93B561.2040902@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.