From: Michal Novotny <minovotn@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Make NIC model fallback to default when specified model is not supported
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:05:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C973FFD.9080904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100920105341.GD18143@redhat.com>
On 09/20/2010 12:53 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:48:50PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
>
>> On 09/20/2010 12:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/20/2010 11:47 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> this is the patch to introduce a NIC model fallback to default when
>>>> model
>>>> specified is not supported. It's been tested on i386-softmmu target on
>>>> i386 host using the Windows XP x86 virtual machine and by trying to
>>>> setup
>>>> the invalid (unsupported) model of NIC device. Also, the new constant in
>>>> the net.h called the DEFAULT_NIC_MODEL has been introduced to be able to
>>>> change the default NIC model easily. This variable is being used to set
>>>> the default NIC model when necessary.
>>>>
>>> Why? If it's not supported, it shouldn't run.
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>>
>> I don't think so. It makes sense it shouldn't run for case of pure qemu
>> but since there's newly added support for xen (and also there's support
>> for other virtualization platforms to be used with the qemu device
>> model) it should fallback with just a warning since otherwise those
>> platforms, like e.g. mentioned Xen, will leave defunct device models
>> there and the guests won't run be running at all ending up with no
>> state. If there's a warning with information it's falling back to
>> default the user can notice if he wants to but it won't leave the
>> defunct device models anymore which can be pretty hard to determine
>> what's going on there for standard user that doesn't have much
>> experience with e.g. Xen yet.
>>
> IMHO this is just a bug in the xen mgmt layer. If the QEMU device model
> dies/quits, then XenD should teardown the guest, since you can't do any
> useful work once the device model has crashed. Silently switching to a
> different NIC model than the one requested is definitely a wrong approach.
>
> Daniel
>
When the qemu-dm has crashed we can't do anything with the guest, that's
correct. Nevertheless do you think that we should bail with error and
just fix the layer of xen management to check whether there's a device
model still running or not? It's being spawned by XenD itself so we
would need to check whether this process is not a zombie using the
/proc/$PID/stat or use some better way to get the state. Unfortunately
using /proc/$PID/stat would kill the portability of the code.
The other way is to implement the thread that will be (periodically or
"on change") checking the device model state and that will be
terminating the domain when device model dies/quits. I'm not saying this
is the bad approach but we've been talking with Mirek about at least
RHEL-5 version and he told me that he recommends to implement a fallback
to the default NIC.
Daniel, if you consider RHEL-5 version, what do you prefer to do with
this one? Fix it somehow in the XenD or is altering the device model OK
for this version? Also, the patch has been already sent upstream Xen for
consideration about an hour ago.
Michal
--
Michal Novotny<minovotn@redhat.com>, RHCE
Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-20 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-20 9:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Make NIC model fallback to default when specified model is not supported Michal Novotny
2010-09-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2010-09-20 10:48 ` Michal Novotny
2010-09-20 10:53 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-09-20 11:05 ` Michal Novotny [this message]
2010-09-20 11:07 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-09-20 11:15 ` Michal Novotny
2010-09-20 14:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-09-20 17:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-09-21 7:10 ` Michal Novotny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C973FFD.9080904@redhat.com \
--to=minovotn@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.