From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ehud Gavron Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:51:43 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] b43/b43legacy - Credit Broadcom with enabling the development of the drivers In-Reply-To: References: <1284921651.24835.11.camel@i7.infradead.org> <4C97AFCE.3040806@wetwork.net> <4C97D0B2.9080704@wetwork.net> Message-ID: <4C97D76F.1040601@wetwork.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org On 09/20/2010 02:33 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Please avoid HTML e-mails. > Luis, when I read your first post I thought "Ignore this guy" but then I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Yeah absolutely no HTML. Please avoid giving me commands when you're not my CO. > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ehud Gavron wrote: > >> It is not up to us to "...deal with regulatory considerations..." >> > No, you see, that's wrong because no one else was, That isn't a sentence, and makes no sense if I try to figure out what you intended. > we started getting upstream support from companies "We" got no such thing. > only once we found decent solutions for regulatory. I think there's a noun missing from there, baby. > So as much as you want to bark Woof woof, baby. > that we don't need to deal with them I can already prove to you that you were wrong. I "were" wrong? Cool. So now I'm not. Cool. Thanks. > If you don't you simply don't get support, if you do, then you accelerate the > pace of adoption for Linux. One way or another the changes have to > happen, how you manage to get the changes done will highly affect how > soon you'll get support. > Yeah. Like my older brothers used to say: It's time for you to go to bed. E > >> The "best we can do" is code, and that's what coders do. The lawyers can do what lawyers do.* >> > And what do you want to code? Piece of shit reverse engineered quality > code? I guarantee you if you get proper vendor support the quality of > the drivers improves considerably. > > >> and we're ahead of others because we're not wasting our time on legal crap. >> > No, we are ahead because we envision the path to enhancing radio > capabilities and dynamic communication. The regulatory solutions in > place in Linux help with regulatory considerations but as a side > effect it also paves the way for next generation radio technologies. > > Luis > -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5507 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: