Re: [mac80211] mac80211: Support multiple VIFS per AP in debugfs.

[Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>]

On 09/21/2010 05:15 AM, greearb@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Ben Greear<greearb@candelatech.com>
>
> MAC address of AP isn't unique..need to add the device
> name as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear<greearb@candelatech.com>
> ---
> :100644 100644 76839d4... e802fce... M	net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
>   net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c |    5 +++--
>   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
> index 76839d4..e802fce 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
> @@ -301,14 +301,15 @@ STA_OPS(ht_capa);
>   void ieee80211_sta_debugfs_add(struct sta_info *sta)
>   {
>   	struct dentry *stations_dir = sta->local->debugfs.stations;
> -	u8 mac[3*ETH_ALEN];
> +	u8 mac[3*ETH_ALEN + IFNAMSIZ + 2];
>
>   	sta->debugfs.add_has_run = true;
>
>   	if (!stations_dir)
>   		return;
>
> -	snprintf(mac, sizeof(mac), "%pM", sta->sta.addr);
> +	snprintf(mac, sizeof(mac), "%pM-%s",
> +		 sta->sta.addr, sta->sdata->name);
>
>   	/*
>   	 * This might fail due to a race condition:

I got to thinking:  Is there any reason to put the sta.addr in there?

Maybe just use sta->sdata->name?  Seems it might be easier for
scripts to deal with?

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com