From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1OySMB-0003Km-Bx for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:39:43 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50771 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OySM8-0003Jj-U0 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:39:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OySM7-00027q-Rd for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:39:40 -0400 Received: from exhub016-2.exch016.msoutlookonline.net ([207.5.72.164]:53420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OySM7-00026z-NU for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:39:39 -0400 Received: from [10.1.1.235] (72.242.190.170) by smtpx16.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.190) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.234.1; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:19:27 -0700 Message-ID: <4C9A2C8A.5070904@cfl.rr.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:19:22 -0400 From: Phillip Susi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB References: <1285054276.10425.39.camel@hp.my.own.domain> <20100921145445.GQ8579@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <20100921145445.GQ8579@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ Cc: Lennart Sorensen Subject: Re: Improperly nested partitions, help needed! X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:39:42 -0000 On 9/21/2010 10:54 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: >> How to resolve this problem? According to fdisk the sda1 and sda3 partitions are _not_ overlapping: >> Additionally, does the same warning have to be repeated so many times for every kernel entry??? > > It did not say they overlapped. It said it found a partition table > inside sda3 which is improper given it is not an extended partition > (sda4 is). This sounds like a bug in grub. It should not be looking for an EBR inside a non extended partition, so if there happens to be some old data there that looks like one, it should not matter.