From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: "Michael Büsch" <mb@bu3sch.de>,
"Christian Lamparter" <chunkeey@googlemail.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"Daniel Berger" <daniel@dat-berger.de>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Manual Control about Sending ACKs
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:17:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9A3A1C.4010704@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinr0omWQCaMj91P8=CFZLDLroxWdrV2c=9KjG4e@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/22/2010 10:12 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Michael Büsch<mb@bu3sch.de> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 15:45 +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>
>>>> I suspect you need to be looking at hacking firmware.
>>>> You might look at the open-source ar9170 firmware
>>>> or the b43-openfwwf project.
>>>
>>> probably not ar9170 either.
>>> The ACK - mechanism (response control) is mostly hardwired in
>>> the chip, there is not much to control here.
>>
>> The ack mechanism is implemented in firmware for the b43 chip and I
>> think it's understood pretty much completely how ACKing works in
>> the firmware. So you may want to take a look at b43-openfwwf.
>> The guys who created b43-openfwwf also experimented with this
>> kind of stuff, so you might want to contact them.
>
> You can also look at ath_hw_set_bssid_mask() for ath5k, ath9k, which
Just in case I'm missing something: It doesn't appear that upstream ath5k has any
support for virtual interfaces? I'm trying to get ath5k working
now, based on my .31 patches...
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-22 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-22 10:39 Manual Control about Sending ACKs Daniel Berger
2010-09-22 13:02 ` John W. Linville
2010-09-22 13:45 ` Christian Lamparter
2010-09-22 13:54 ` Michael Büsch
2010-09-22 17:12 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-09-22 17:17 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2010-09-22 18:38 ` Daniel Berger
2010-09-23 18:56 ` AW: " Bjoern Czybik
2010-09-23 20:14 ` Daniel Berger
2010-09-22 18:50 ` Nick Kossifidis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-22 10:36 Daniel Berger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C9A3A1C.4010704@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=daniel@dat-berger.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.