All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	netfilter@vger.kernel.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: decipher the secmark number from nf_conntrack/ip_conntrack
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:53:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9BBE46.8020106@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1009232234400.21529@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>


> No program hard-depends on "secmark=" (not: no program depends on
> procfs/nfct). That field does not show up if you have SECMARK
> disabled - it is guarded by #ifdef - so any parsers out there
> have to cater for its absence. In other words, it is safe to
> remove the field from the output.
>   
Why should that field be removed though - please give me a valid reason? 
The earlier suggestion, by Eric, was to replace the value of it with its 
proper text - this is how it should have been done in the first place!


> I would prefer for the procfs interface to cease existing. At the
> very least to be not added to any more, per consensus
> http://markmail.org/message/h7qeomrtjjjtptio
>   
See my earlier reply - I do not see the need to bloat my images and add 
yet another set of tools for which I have no use whatsoever!

For what? For the dubious privilege to be able to see SELinux contexts 
in text when I could continue to use secmark in the form in which it 
should have been designed/developed in the first place - with its proper 
SELinux context showing instead of that useless number?

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-23 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-19 23:04 decipher the secmark number from nf_conntrack/ip_conntrack Mr Dash Four
2010-09-20  0:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-20 10:41   ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-20 12:23     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-20 12:42       ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-20 18:15         ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-20 21:49         ` Tom Eastep
2010-09-20 23:26           ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-20 23:55             ` Tom Eastep
2010-09-21  9:59             ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-21 20:13               ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-21 20:26                 ` Eric Paris
2010-09-21 21:00                   ` Eric Paris
2010-09-21 22:38                     ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-21 22:42                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-21 22:51                       ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-21 23:10                       ` Eric Paris
2010-09-21 23:35                         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 18:39                           ` Eric Paris
2010-09-23 18:49                             ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 18:52                               ` Eric Paris
2010-09-23 18:57                                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 18:58                                   ` Eric Paris
2010-09-23 19:20                                   ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 19:51                                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 20:05                                       ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 20:18                                       ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 20:34                                         ` Eric Paris
2010-09-23 20:38                                           ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 20:53                                           ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 20:56                                             ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 21:23                                               ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 21:38                                                 ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 22:12                                                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 22:30                                                     ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 22:42                                                       ` Eric Paris
2010-09-23 23:59                                                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-24  0:24                                                         ` Tom Eastep
2010-09-24  0:32                                                           ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-24  1:18                                                           ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-24  0:27                                                         ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 20:42                                         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 20:53                                           ` Mr Dash Four [this message]
2010-09-21 22:29                   ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-22  2:25                   ` Tom Eastep

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C9BBE46.8020106@googlemail.com \
    --to=mr.dash.four@googlemail.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.