Re: rebased version of wireless-testing?

[Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>]

On 09/25/2010 06:43 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:14:30PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>>> You will be better-off pulling wireless-next-2.6 (and maybe
>>> wireless-2.6 as well).  The history there isn't always immutable
>>> (although I prefer it to be), but it will tend to be a lot cleaner
>>> than wireless-testing.
>>
>> Any chance you could push tags in wireless-next-2.6?
>
> Not sure what you mean -- are you not seeing the master-<date>  tags?

It didn't seem like the 2.6.36-rcX tags were there..but then again, maybe
I'm looking for something that doesn't exist?

Basically, my goal is to pull in most or all of the changes from wireless-testing
into a tree based on Linus's tree (2.6.36-rc5 currently).  But, I need to keep
my tree clean enough to deal with rebasing and following Linus's tree because I have
a bunch of my own patches to add as well.

If nothing else, I'll manually pull the virtual-wifi patches that I need out of wireless-testing
and apply them to my tree.

Thanks,
Ben

>
> John


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com