From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758930Ab0I0I3j (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:29:39 -0400 Received: from tuxonice.net ([74.207.252.127]:45279 "EHLO mail.tuxonice.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755911Ab0I0I3i (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:29:38 -0400 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Message-ID: <4CA055EF.6050608@tuxonice.net> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:29:35 +1000 From: Nigel Cunningham User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10pre) Gecko/20100903 Shredder/3.1.4pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrey Rahmatullin CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM , LKML , TuxOnIce-devel Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] Swsusp patches applied to suspend-2.6#linux-next References: <1285566238-10966-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> <20100927080000.GA7032@wrars-comp.wrarsdomain> In-Reply-To: <20100927080000.GA7032@wrars-comp.wrarsdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi. On 27/09/10 18:00, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:43:35PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >> Hi again Rafael. >> >> As discussed, here are the patches, modified to apply against your current >> linux-next tree. A new first patch splits compression support out into its >> own file, removing the need to have two versions of the load_image and >> save_image routines, minimising the changes to the remainder of the >> patches and making things cleaner than would otherwise be the case. >> >> On my laptop, single-threaded compression actually slows writing down from >> 175MB/s to around 100-120MB/s (depending on how well the image compresses). >> Reading speed improves from 218MB/s to around 245MB/s. I expect that >> multithreaded writing would bring the writing (and reading) speeds back >> up. It's on my swsusp to do list :) > Works here. Ah. You're too fast for me :) What sort of speeds are you seeing? Regards, Nigel