From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1P0FM1-00026O-JB for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:10:57 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53206 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P0FLy-00026F-Hr for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:10:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0FLx-0004Bl-BJ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:10:54 -0400 Received: from exhub016-3.exch016.msoutlookonline.net ([207.5.72.226]:40999) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0FLx-00049j-6q for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:10:53 -0400 Received: from [10.1.1.235] (72.242.190.170) by SMTPX16.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.190) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.234.1; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:10:47 -0700 Message-ID: <4CA0B3F4.9090607@cfl.rr.com> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:10:44 -0400 From: Phillip Susi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB References: <4C9E5AA3.4030109@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C9E5AA3.4030109@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= Subject: Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:10:55 -0000 On 9/25/2010 4:25 PM, Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Hello, all. I've just finished Reed-Solomon and pushedit to > branches/solomon. About 8 sectors (including MBR) aren't protected by > Reed-Solomon. Obviously it can be improved but that would be for post-1.9= 9 So you are adding bit error detection and correction to the boot loader? You realize that the hard disk already does reed-solomon right? So a second layer of it doesn't seem to have much point.