From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1P0Kxz-0004dY-PY for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:10:31 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53572 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P0Kxw-0004dB-Ot for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:10:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0Kxv-0001YO-Oh for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:10:28 -0400 Received: from exhub016-4.exch016.msoutlookonline.net ([207.5.72.225]:19560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0Kxv-0001Xz-JH for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:10:27 -0400 Received: from [10.1.1.235] (72.242.190.170) by smtpx16.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.190) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.234.1; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:10:25 -0700 Message-ID: <4CA1083F.4020301@cfl.rr.com> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:10:23 -0400 From: Phillip Susi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB References: <4C9E5AA3.4030109@gmail.com> <4CA0B3F4.9090607@cfl.rr.com> <20100927161222.GM21862@riva.ucam.org> In-Reply-To: <20100927161222.GM21862@riva.ucam.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ Cc: Colin Watson Subject: Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:10:30 -0000 On 9/27/2010 12:12 PM, Colin Watson wrote: >> So you are adding bit error detection and correction to the boot loader? >> You realize that the hard disk already does reed-solomon right? So a >> second layer of it doesn't seem to have much point. > > You're missing context. Apparently. Fill me in?