From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from proxy.dresearch.de ([87.193.137.100] helo=mail.dresearch.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0TOy-0006cI-VX for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:11:07 +0200 Received: from exchange.intern.dresearch.de (owa.xfer-intern.dresearch.de [192.168.32.16]) by mail.dresearch.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB83491278 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:10:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.32.10.2]) by exchange.intern.dresearch.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:10:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA186DE.5070202@dresearch.de> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:10:38 +0200 From: Steffen Sledz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1285230784-16893-1-git-send-email-sledz@dresearch.de> <4CA04557.5070207@dresearch.de> <4CA059F2.5090509@dresearch.de> <4CA0FB52.4090000@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA0FB52.4090000@mentor.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2010 06:10:35.0017 (UTC) FILETIME=[DD10D790:01CB5ED3] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 87.193.137.100 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sledz@dresearch.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,URIBL_RHS_DOB autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-2.6.24: avoid kernel error if ubifs superblock read fails X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:11:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 27.09.2010 22:15, schrieb Tom Rini: >>> the first concern is that mainline 2.6.34 still has the >>> code you have deleted. I'd expect that others would have >>> bumped into this too and that it would have been fixed this >>> upstream. Since it isn't, chances are that upstream might >>> have fixed the autofs detection in a different way. If they >>> do this differently maybe we should backport that solution. >> >> I've suggested the same patch at the LKML and informed the >> UBIFS authors. But i do believe because of it's "low prio" >> it will need some time to go into the mainline. >=20 > So it is queued somewhere then? Yes, meanwhile in a modified way. I'll wait the final decision there and then push the commit at least for = the 2.6.24 backport. I don't know, if it's really necessary to patch all linux recipes because= there are a lot of them and it's just a cosmetic change. Steffen --=20 Steffen Sledz DResearch Digital Media Systems GmbH Otto-Schmirgal-Str.3, D-10319 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 (30) 515932237 mailto:sledz@DResearch.DE Fax: +49 (30) 515932299 http://www.DResearch.DE Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Dr. Michael Weber, Werner M=F6gle; Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg; HRB 54412; Ust.-IDNr. DE169013825; WEEE Reg.-Nr. DE 85995642