From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Grzesiek_S=F3jka?= Subject: Re: GeForce FX5200 dual DVI & Samsung 204b Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:53:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA1C943.8080607@pfu.pl> References: <4C9E0167.8000507@pfu.pl> <20100928004117.0a0ae0ca@daedalus.pq.iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100928004117.0a0ae0ca-cxYvVS3buNOdIgDiPM52R8c4bpwCjbIv@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nouveau-bounces+gcfxn-nouveau=m.gmane.org-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Errors-To: nouveau-bounces+gcfxn-nouveau=m.gmane.org-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org By the way: There is now direct implication between the refresh rate and the PixelClock. In theory you can do arbitrary low resolution/refresh rate by arbitrary high PixelClock. Only thing is that setting to high values of PixelClock does not make any sense.