From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "K. Richard Pixley" <rich@noir.com>
Subject: Re: btrfs user survey?
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:13:37 -0700
Message-ID: <4CA20621.6000406@noir.com>
References: <AANLkTikcYTyxQ2NT_CJi4OEvnsGti8rq=tQ+=HxNrMxJ@mail.gmail.com> <m3vd5qq01x.fsf@pullcord.laptop.org> <20100928065827.GB4167@glandium.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100928065827.GB4167@glandium.org>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

  On 9/27/10 23:58 , Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:44:10PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi Francis,
>>
>>     >  Well, all in all, you get the idea, and I'm probably not the guy
>>     >  to craft questions for such a survey. But having input from as
>>     >  large a panel of users as possible would be a nice thing to have.
>>
>> Your questions are fine -- I might add:
>>
>> * Rank the following future features in importance, 4 == most important
>> [ ] working fsck
>> [ ] GUIs for userspace actions e.g. snapshots
>> [ ] data deduplication
>> [ ] hot data relocation
> [ ] proper reporting of used and free space
[  ] a fix to the current limit on the number of links to a file - ie, 
the backup breaker

--rich