From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phillip Susi Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm-thinp: new device mapper target to thin provision storage Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:41:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4CA341F1.70305@cfl.rr.com> References: <1285706977.22966.20.camel@o> <4CA261C5.7070005@cfl.rr.com> <1285759512.23010.1.camel@o> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1285759512.23010.1.camel@o> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: heinzm@redhat.com, device-mapper development Cc: agk@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 9/29/2010 7:25 AM, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 17:44 -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: >> How is this different than snapshotting a zero target? > > Like Hanness mentioned: you can free space. Could you clarify that a bit? Is space only freed if you reduce the length of a device? You can't do the same with a snapshot?