Re: [PATCH 11/18] git notes merge: Add automatic conflict resolvers (ours, theirs, union)

[Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>]

On 09/28/2010 05:23 PM, Johan Herland wrote:
> @@ -788,6 +792,21 @@ static int merge(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	expand_notes_ref(&remote_ref);
>  	o.remote_ref = remote_ref.buf;
>  
> +	if (strategy) {
> +		if (!strcmp(strategy, "manual"))
> +			o.strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_MANUAL;
> +		else if (!strcmp(strategy, "ours"))
> +			o.strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_OURS;
> +		else if (!strcmp(strategy, "theirs"))
> +			o.strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_THEIRS;
> +		else if (!strcmp(strategy, "union"))
> +			o.strategy = NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_UNION;
> +		else {
> +			error("Unknown -X/--resolve strategy: %s", strategy);

Is it -X/--resolve or -s/--strategy? This error confuses me.

> diff --git a/notes-merge.c b/notes-merge.c
> index f625ebd..6fa59d8 100644
> --- a/notes-merge.c
> +++ b/notes-merge.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,35 @@ static void diff_tree_local(struct notes_merge_options *o,
>  	diff_tree_release_paths(&opt);
>  }
>  
> +static int merge_one_change(struct notes_merge_options *o,
> +			    struct notes_merge_pair *p, struct notes_tree *t)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Return 0 if change was resolved (and added to notes_tree),
> +	 * 1 if conflict
> +	 */
> +	switch (o->strategy) {
> +	case NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_MANUAL:
> +		return 1;
> +	case NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_OURS:
> +		OUTPUT(o, 2, "Using local notes for %s", sha1_to_hex(p->obj));
> +		/* nothing to do */
> +		return 0;
> +	case NOTES_MERGE_RESOLVE_THEIRS:
> +		OUTPUT(o, 2, "Using remote notes for %s", sha1_to_hex(p->obj));
> +		if (add_note(t, p->obj, p->remote, combine_notes_overwrite))
> +			die("confused: combine_notes_overwrite failed");

This will say:

fatal: confused: combine_notes_overwrite failed

Do we actually need the "confused" part? Heh, maybe we need a confused()
function?