From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] SD/MMC-driver for MX35/51 (and improvements to SDHCI) Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:17:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA74CF6.8090706@eukrea.com> References: <1285790884-3516-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from 63.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.56]:40793 "HELO 63.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753300Ab0JBPRO (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:17:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1285790884-3516-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Zhu Richard-R65037 , zhangfei gao , Anton Vorontsov , Philip Rakity , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Le 29/09/2010 22:07, Wolfram Sang a =E9crit : > Okay, here is the next version of my patch series. The first four are > updates/improvements for sdhci and sdhci-pltfm and are of generic int= erest, > too. I am still hoping for some Acked-by/Tested-by tags ;) Changes fr= om the > previous version are mentioned in the seperate files. I should have a= ddressed > all concerns raised. If not, please speak up. > Tested-by : Eric B=E9nard Eric From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric@eukrea.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?=) Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:17:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH V3 0/6] SD/MMC-driver for MX35/51 (and improvements to SDHCI) In-Reply-To: <1285790884-3516-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> References: <1285790884-3516-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <4CA74CF6.8090706@eukrea.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le 29/09/2010 22:07, Wolfram Sang a ?crit : > Okay, here is the next version of my patch series. The first four are > updates/improvements for sdhci and sdhci-pltfm and are of generic interest, > too. I am still hoping for some Acked-by/Tested-by tags ;) Changes from the > previous version are mentioned in the seperate files. I should have addressed > all concerns raised. If not, please speak up. > Tested-by : Eric B?nard Eric