From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric@eukrea.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?=) Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:31:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2] i.MX31 and i.MX35 : fix errate TLSbo65953 and ENGcm09472 In-Reply-To: <20101005183308.GX11737@pengutronix.de> References: <20101005094510.GJ28242@pengutronix.de> <1286280012-19809-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <20101005183308.GX11737@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <4CAB7D0F.9020600@eukrea.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Uwe, Le 05/10/2010 20:33, Uwe Kleine-K?nig a ?crit : >> + /* invalidate I cache */ >> + "mov %0, #0\n" >> + "mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c5, 0\n" >> + /* clear and invalidate D cache */ >> + "mov %0, #0\n" > mcr doesn't change the value of %0, does it? Then there's no need to > set it to 0 once more. > >> + "mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c14, 0\n" >> + /* WFI */ >> + "mov %0, #0\n" > ditto > >> + "mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c0, 4\n" >> + "nop\n" "nop\n" "nop\n" "nop\n" >> + "nop\n" "nop\n" "nop\n" >> + /* enable I and D cache */ >> + "mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n" > If you spend two registers there is no need to reread this register. > >> + "orr %0, %0, #0x00001000\n" >> + "orr %0, %0, #0x00000004\n" >> + "mcr p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n" >> + :: "r" (reg)); > ... and the s/:: "/: "=/ as I suggested earlier. > well, this code comes from Freescale and if everything was perfect it wouldn't be necessary as this is an errata fix so I'm not sure this can be considered as a code to optimize. Moreover it follows exactly what is suggested in the workaround described on page 8 of this PDF : http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/errata/MCIMX31CE.pdf so I'm not sure we should modify it. The other function they sent me had even more duplicated lines than this one so it's difficult to know what is necessary and what isn't. I can test it with your suggestions but the extra mov & mrc may be there to add instructions cycle between each mcr to be sure the workaround does its job. Best regards, Eric