From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Mvbge driver broken on kirkwood platforms after ARM relocation
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:36:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CACB3AE.3030800@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CAC9C17.2000206@free.fr>
Le 06/10/2010 17:56, Albert ARIBAUD a ?crit :
> Le 06/10/2010 16:22, Prafulla Wadaskar a ?crit :
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:wd at denx.de]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:00 PM
>>> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
>>> Cc: Albert ARIBAUD; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare;
>>> Prabhanjan Sarnaik
>>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Mvbge driver broken on kirkwood
>>> platforms after ARM relocation
>>>
>>> Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
>>>
>>> In message
>>> <F766E4F80769BD478052FB6533FA745D19A69E25C8@SC-VEXCH4.marvell.
>>> com> you wrote:
>>>>
>>>> After rebasing to new ARM relocation code base and updating
>>> Kirkwood board support.
>>>> I am unable to get my network driver through (mvgbe)
>>>>
>>>> Have you tested this on edminv2 platform?
>>>> If it is working at your end? Can you please cross check
>>> the same with Kirkwood platform?
>>>
>>> Try running the "dcache off" command before accessing the network and
>>> see if this changes anything.
>>
>> I tried this too, I have disabled dcache in init.
>> .. no difference.
>>
>> Debugging continued..
>>
>> Regards..
>> Prafulla . .
>
> Trying this on an openrd client board with the openrd_base config. Both
> boards have the same exact RAMs, however the DRAM: line is acting funny
> on me: fresh with my relocation patch above master, it says:
>
> SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A0
> DRAM: 192.5 MiB
>
> ... while the actual RAM size is 512 MiB.
>
> (Even considering that the original Marvell code may have the
> count-only-half bug that Chris' patch fixes, that's only 385 MiB...
> Weirder yet: adding Chris' patch above mine, I get 3.6 GiB... But let's
> chase only one rabbit at a time)
>
> Prafulla, how much RAM does your build see on your board(s)?
globally defining DEBUG gives:
U-Boot 2010.09-00102-gb4a7c1c-dirty (Oct 06 2010 - 19:13:59)
OpenRD_base
U-Boot code: 00600000 -> 0065DFBC BSS: -> 006A46E0
SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A0
monitor len: 000A46E0
ramsize: 00000000
Obviously RAM detection is bugged. This explains the following computations:
TLB table at: ffff0000
Top of RAM usable for U-Boot at: ffff0000
Reserving 657k for U-Boot at: fff4b000
Reserving 1152k for malloc() at: ffe2b000
Reserving 48 Bytes for Board Info at: ffe2afd0
Reserving 92 Bytes for Global Data at: ffe2af74
New Stack Pointer is: ffe2af70
RAM Configuration:
Bank #0: 00000000 0 Bytes
Bank #1: 00000000 0 Bytes
Bank #2: 00000000 0 Bytes
Bank #3: 00000000 3.3 GiB
This weird bank #3 one may be a consequence, or not, of the buggy RAM
computation.
relocation Offset is: ff94b000
Further debugging going on.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-06 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-04 22:22 [U-Boot] [PATCH] orion5x: optimize window size computation Albert Aribaud
2010-10-05 5:57 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2010-10-05 21:40 ` Chris Moore
2010-10-06 5:51 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-06 9:34 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2010-10-06 13:29 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-06 13:47 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-06 14:24 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2010-10-06 9:38 ` [U-Boot] Mvbge driver broken on kirkwood platforms after ARM relocation Prafulla Wadaskar
2010-10-06 13:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-06 13:54 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-06 13:56 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-06 14:14 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2010-10-06 14:43 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-06 14:22 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2010-10-06 15:56 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-06 17:36 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2010-10-06 17:54 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-07 4:37 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
2010-10-07 9:57 ` Prafulla Wadaskar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CACB3AE.3030800@free.fr \
--to=albert.aribaud@free.fr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.