All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rogan Dawes <rogan@dawes.za.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] RFQ: Makefile cleanup
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:27:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CAD6845.904@dawes.za.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101007052250.151801539A0@gemini.denx.de>

On 2010/10/07 7:22 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Rogan Dawes,
> 
> In message <4CAD569E.3020706@dawes.za.net> you wrote:
>>
>> Keep in mind that the Linux folk are looking for an alternative to the
>> defconfig mess that they have currently.
>>
>> Linus has stated that he will delete all the ARM defconfigs soon.
> 
> I think the current Linux approach is focussed on generating single
> kernel images that can be used on as many as possible platforms. This
> is needed for things like building Linux distributions and such.
> 
> U-Boot, on the other hand, is very much bound to specific hardware
> configurations, and at least so far (*) we will always need secial
> configurations for each board.  This makes a pretty much fundamental
> difference.
> 
> (*) We discussed before to auto-configure U-Boot for example based on
> a device tee description of the hardware. But it is still a long way
> to go.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk

My understanding of it (although I have not followed it closely) was
that they were looking for a mechanism to specify those things that
should be in the configuration at a high level, that would then lead to
the rest of the dependent items being selected automatically.

So, rather than having a *full* config file (and all the associated
churn as individual settings are changed within the kernel), they would
only have a snippet that selects the specific features for the board,
that would then cascade-select the rest of the settings for a full
kernel config.

That was considered acceptable, afaik.

Rogan

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-07  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-06 19:54 [U-Boot] RFQ: Makefile cleanup Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-06 20:16 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-06 20:32   ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-06 20:42   ` Scott Wood
2010-10-06 21:19     ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-10 15:14     ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-10 15:46       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-10 18:24         ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-10 19:10           ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-10 19:57             ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-10 21:04               ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-06 21:21   ` Graeme Russ
2010-10-07  0:46     ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-07  5:11       ` Rogan Dawes
2010-10-07  5:22         ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-07  6:27           ` Rogan Dawes [this message]
2010-10-07  5:19     ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CAD6845.904@dawes.za.net \
    --to=rogan@dawes.za.net \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.