From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Pavel Machek <pma@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] kernel oopses when killing realtime task
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:32:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CADBDC2.8080600@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101007115728.GA24500@domain.hid>
Am 07.10.2010 13:57, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have... quite an interesting setup here.
>
> SMP machine, with special PCI card; that card has GPIOs and serial
> ports. Unfortunately, there's only one interrupt, shared between
> serials and GPIO pins, and serials are way too complex to be handled
> by realtime layer.
>
> So I ended up with
>
> // we also have an interrupt handler:
> ret = rtdm_irq_request(&my_context->irq_handle,
> gpio_rt_config.irq, demo_interrupt,
> RTDM_IRQTYPE_SHARED,
> context->device->proc_name, my_context);
>
> and
>
> static int demo_interrupt(rtdm_irq_t *irq_context)
> {
> struct demodrv_context *ctx;
> int dev_id;
> int ret = RTDM_IRQ_HANDLED; // usual return value
> unsigned pending, output;
>
> ctx = rtdm_irq_get_arg(irq_context, struct demodrv_context);
> dev_id = ctx->dev_id;
>
> if (!ctx->ready) {
> printk(KERN_CRIT "Unexpected interrupt\n");
> return XN_ISR_PROPAGATE;
Who sets ready and when? Looks racy.
> }
>
> rtdm_lock_get(&ctx->lock);
>
> pending = pgread(GPIO_IRQ_ID);
> pgwrite(0, GPIO_IRQ_ID);
> output = pgread(GPIO_STATUS_OUT);
> output ^= (1<<3);
> pgwrite(output, GPIO_STATUS_OUT);
>
> // do stuff
> if (events > 1000) {
> rtdm_event_signal(&ctx->irq_event);
> events = 0;
> }
> events++;
>
> rtdm_lock_put(&ctx->lock);
>
> /* We need to propagate the interrupt, so that PMC-6L serials
> work. Result is that interrupt latencies can't be
> guaranteed when serials are in use. */
>
> return RTDM_IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> Unregistration is:
> my_context->ready = 0;
> rtdm_irq_disable(&my_context->irq_handle);
Where is rtdm_irq_free? Again, this ready flag looks racy.
>
>
> Unfortunately, when the userspace app is ran and killed repeatedly (so
> that interrupt is registered/unregistered all the time), I get
> oopses in __ipipe_dispatch_wired() -- it seems to call into the NULL
> pointer.
>
> I decided that "wired" interrupt when the source is shared between
> Linux and Xenomai, is wrong thing, so I disable "wired" interrupts
> altogether, but that only moved oops to __virq_end.
This is wrong. The only way to get a determistically shared IRQs across
domains is via the wired path, either using the pattern Gilles cited or,
in a slight variation, signaling down via a separate rtdm_nrtsig.
>
> I'm using 2.6.27.21-ELinOS-46 with xenomai-2.4.7 . Problem does go
> away if I boot with maxcpus=1.
>
> Any ideas? (Besides using non-historic kernel; but that's
> unfortunately not exactly easy here.)
>
> Pavel
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-07 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 11:57 [Xenomai-help] kernel oopses when killing realtime task Pavel Machek
2010-10-07 12:11 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-10-07 13:00 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-10-07 12:32 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-10-08 7:01 ` Pavel Machek
2010-10-08 7:20 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-10-08 8:17 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-08 8:41 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-08 8:57 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-08 9:00 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-08 9:41 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-13 9:03 ` Pavel Machek
2010-10-13 9:16 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-13 9:26 ` Pavel Machek
2010-10-13 14:52 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-25 16:48 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-25 18:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 19:08 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-25 19:11 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-25 19:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 19:20 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-25 19:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 21:12 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-25 21:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 21:40 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-25 21:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-26 4:43 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-26 5:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-26 19:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-28 5:17 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-28 7:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-28 7:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-28 7:46 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-11-07 15:15 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-11-07 16:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-07 16:55 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-11-07 16:59 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-11-07 17:19 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-11-09 8:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 8:26 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-11-09 8:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 9:36 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-11-09 13:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-12 8:48 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-11-12 9:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-12 13:57 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-11-12 14:30 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-12 17:42 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-11-12 18:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-14 21:28 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-07 14:07 ` Philippe Gerum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CADBDC2.8080600@domain.hid \
--to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=pma@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.