From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3u0v-0001cq-Cs for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:12:18 +0200 Received: from svr-orw-exc-08.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.97]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1P3u0W-0005PM-0r from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:11:52 -0700 Received: from na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com ([134.86.114.213]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-08.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:11:51 -0700 Received: from [172.30.80.69] ([172.30.80.69]) by na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:11:50 -0600 Message-ID: <4CADFF48.1050504@mentor.com> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:11:36 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4CADCF1E.3090602@mentor.com> <4CADD11C.6020800@freyther.de> In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2010 17:11:50.0613 (UTC) FILETIME=[BB481850:01CB6642] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.94.38.131 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Tom_Rini@mentor.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Updating libtiff X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:12:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/10/7 Holger Freyther : >> On 10/07/2010 09:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> >>> I think we should go with: >>> - Add tiff_4.0.0beta6.bb which should be compatible with beta5 and will get >>> upgrades right. >> but not with tiff_4.0.0.bb... then you would need to bump PE... >> > > Yeah, that's why I was told to use the 3.9.2+ construct. > > Forgot if there was a reason (e.g. security vulnerability) not to keep 3.9.2 Why not just have this: # Bump for 4.0.0 release! PE = 1 In tiff_4.0.0beta6.bb ? -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation