From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759714Ab0JHVnw (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:43:52 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:10368 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755003Ab0JHVnv (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:43:51 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,305,1283756400"; d="scan'208";a="333931323" Message-ID: <4CAF9096.20408@intel.com> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:43:50 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russ Anderson CC: linux-kernel , Yinghai Lu , "tglx@linutronix.de" , Jack Steiner Subject: Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV References: <20101008213429.GB7223@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20101008213429.GB7223@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/08/2010 02:34 PM, Russ Anderson wrote: > [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV > > Recent community kernels do not boot on SGI UV x86 hardware with > more than one socket. I suspect the problem is due to recent > bootmem/e820 changes. > You may want to try the tip master kernel, which has a bunch of changes in that area. Unfortunately, I think you can probably understand that UV-specific debugging is out of reach for most people outside SGI. -hpa