From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4CB06FB8.4020106@domain.hid> Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:35:52 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4CB06CE9.9090204@domain.hid> <4CB06E2F.7070209@domain.hid> <4CB06E7F.7070402@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4CB06E7F.7070402@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [forge] irqbench removal List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Xenomai core Jan Kiszka wrote: > Am 09.10.2010 15:29, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Philippe, >>> >>> irqbench does not inherently depend on a third I-pipe domain. >> Yes, but it inherently depends on x86 too. > > Not by design, just by missing contributions to add a few more I/O bindings. Currently it does not compile on anything else than x86. Denx has a "gpioirqbench": http://git.denx.de/?p=gpioirqbench.git;a=summary Maybe it is time to find some common ground and have atlast a bench which can run an all architectures ? -- Gilles.