From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Reinhard Meyer Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 11:39:25 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: seperate block number into small parts for multi-write cmd In-Reply-To: References: <1283757567-15161-1-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> <4C84B322.1000500@emk-elektronik.de> <4C84BF66.8080704@emk-elektronik.de> <4C84D599.4030100@emk-elektronik.de> <20101010064822.ED08C14F310@gemini.denx.de> <20101010092257.154CE1508A2@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4CB189CD.30801@emk-elektronik.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Lei Wen, > I think it is a generic problem, and I am also curios why other people > don't complain for it... Because it is NOT a generic problem. > In Linux code, the multi-write write semantic also has such limitation > in platform code. > So if UBOOT also could have this, that would be so nice... In PLATFORM code? Not in GENERIC code? > > As you also says that the mmc also server greatly for SD, while the > published SD host controller > spec has such limitation, I think It is general, right? ... You REPEATEDLY state this since weeks, but that "specification" is just an example of how a minimal controller could be. Reinhard