From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4CB42EFA.6040305@domain.hid>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:48:42 +0200
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4CB41FF2.9030602@domain.hid>	<1286873819.1759.0.camel@domain.hid>
	<4CB42E34.2090404@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <4CB42E34.2090404@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Analogy regressions in xenomai 2.5.5.1
List-Id: Xenomai life and development <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Daniele Nicolodi <daniele@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 12/10/10 10:56, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> When I proposed some easy changes to the analogy API, to make it much
>>> less confusing with trivial changes, Alexis expressed concerns about API
>>> stability. What about functional stability? I think the reported ones
>>> are major problems easily catch with simple pre-release tests...
>> Do not hesitate to provide them.
> 
> I'll try to write something later today. There is a testing
> infrastructure where those test should fit? I haven't found one in
> xenomai source code.

Please send the test cases, we will take care of the rest.

-- 
					    Gilles.