From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5fdE-0006pg-Ly for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:15:19 +0200 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so558989wwd.0 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:14:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n0xMUgo3iP2GbokM9W37tiZwdWsEzXt2JRY+VmilQn8=; b=SpmRiOtA6luUvodqAh9jxlmLv5b/p/PwtV9n9UlB2LJCLQPWslNeGfZxUADSOOdDTU atXNLD0H3/eWtglG0TE5Uet25VFVoBVpi8arJjs5gjH0vIeq0BtJaZwI4uYX3sp3LS58 xnNp6hmNZVbAjNap92Urjk+RFyxmlc/QBGWGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=IYT6zEPz57WiyHC+gYMJC3Am8FSFuIv+5nl3bZi5EIzd0XnMkuDRV8GMnRyCHm3wkG 9pFLUhWli9u6FompUzZRZox9n65CrFMFXNkmvuRxs5j7v2Sc1NGUwqozRyyxQ+W/G9m/ njQfsHfMqx8SANqsidwlHkR586MAzCTJZvJ64= Received: by 10.216.186.207 with SMTP id w57mr4183509wem.19.1286892868186; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:14:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.134] (dsl-51-41.dsl.netsource.ie [213.79.51.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x75sm4070149weq.2.2010.10.12.07.14.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CB46D41.1030903@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:14:25 +0100 From: Arigead User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4CAC8B19.9050502@gmail.com> <20101006145051.GK3264@jama> <4CB01BED.5030407@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CB01BED.5030407@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 74.125.82.41 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: captain.deadly@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: /usr/bin/fop ??? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:15:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Arigead wrote: > Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:43:37PM +0100, Arigead wrote: >>>> trying to "bitbake tangogps" and getting errors about /usr/bin/fop >>>> >>>> I'm searching for a solution but not getting too far with that. I'm not >>>> sure why and embedded verison of tangogps would require Apache FOP but >>>> I'm on the wrong end of a learning curve. >>>> >>>> Cheers for any pointers which would get me over this hurdle. >>> what about providing whole log.do_compile and log.do_configure to be >>> sure which recipe has this problem (I see libx11 in log, but you're >>> talking about tangogps). >>> >>> Regards, >> In case it fails in libx11 then it's probably because of: >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/commit/?id=e14273f44c1501ab51db4adcb83b18a1073787d8 >> you can force fop disabled with --with-fop=no in EXTRA_OECONF or try >> to fix XORG_WITH_FOP (to ignore fop on buildhost and look only in >> sysroots) >> >> Regards, >> > > Been busy and only getting back to this now. Yes that worked buy forcing > fop out of the libx11 build. Thanks a million for your help. I'm not > sure why this problem only seems to be effecting my build and nobody > else seemed to hit that issue. Anyhow back on the road again. > > Thanks again > I spoke to soon when I said that I was on the road again, and I've only confused myself trying to get to the bottom of this. When I said I was on the road again bitbake libx11 was working perfect and it still is. My problem is that even when I've done a sucessfull bitbake of libx11 a bitbake of tangogps will fail on libx11. That's confusing the hell out of my and it's the do_install that's the problem. I'm on the wrong end of a learning curve and can't seem to understand the issue. NOTE: package libx11-native-1_1.3.99.902-r9.0: task do_install: Failed ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting ERROR: Build of virtual:native:/home/john/programming/openmoko/shr/shr-unstable/openembedded/recipes/xorg-lib/libx11_1.3.99.902.bb do_install failed It still seems to be failing on fop even though the libx11.inc file now specifically forces "--with-fop=no". Complete log is at: http://pastebin.com/ScdPb4Dj Any ideas very gratefully received.