diff for duplicates of <4CB47175.6020302@gmail.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 8cc1827..cec9903 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -29,3 +29,8 @@ bad commit more lengthy... Justin P. Mattock + + +-------------- next part -------------- +An HTML attachment was scrubbed... +URL: http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20101012/46fd43a0/attachment.html diff --git a/a/2.bin b/a/2.bin deleted file mode 100644 index 0eba579..0000000 --- a/a/2.bin +++ /dev/null @@ -1,50 +0,0 @@ -<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> -<html> - <head> - <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" - http-equiv="Content-Type"> - </head> - <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> - On 10/12/2010 04:39 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote: - <blockquote - cite="mid:AANLkTi=RFa1UkhfHuq_dUUYaNaPD1yWnDwRQ+wZ8p-C_@mail.gmail.com" - type="cite"> - <pre wrap="">Looks like the previously discussed flex bug, e.g.: -<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=126763385807985&w=2">http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=126763385807985&w=2</a> - -</pre> - </blockquote> - <br> - <small>yeah I was thinking this as well.. from what it seems this is - hitting with the<br> - packages provided by suse, as well as the userspace packages. but - unlike<br> - my other system that was hitting this, the error is with building - a module, instead of building<br> - the policy.(as a workaround I would throw in an older version of - flex, then build only<br> - checkpolicy/module to get it working..(or if I was too lazy just - copy a version that<br> - works over to the other machine)).<br> - <br> - I can go through this today and see what I get.. one thing I - noticed with the packages<br> - from suse(11.4) is, policycoreutils is older than same of the - newer packages they have,<br> - causing other errors with python i.e. seinfo not found kind of - error.<br> - <br> - As for flex itself.. I do remember starting a bisect on that - package, but then realized<br> - that from version 2.34(if I remember correctly) to 2.35 theirs - just a few patches that<br> - are rather lengthy, making a bisect possible, but then going - through the bad commit<br> - more lengthy...<br> - <br> - Justin P. Mattock<br> - <br> - <br> - </small> - </body> -</html> diff --git a/a/2.hdr b/a/2.hdr deleted file mode 100644 index e403a18..0000000 --- a/a/2.hdr +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2 +0,0 @@ -Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 09ae055..e2466cd 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,12 +1,10 @@ "ref\0AANLkTimEezzq9XqJSpO3B4LY3NWQLiD2CN-0Z4Wd764U@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\0AANLkTi=RFa1UkhfHuq_dUUYaNaPD1yWnDwRQ+wZ8p-C_@mail.gmail.com\0" - "From\0Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: ERROR 'syntax error' at token ':c' on line 42:\0" + "From\0justinmattock@gmail.com (Justin P. Mattock)\0" + "Subject\0[refpolicy] ERROR 'syntax error' at token ':c' on line 42:\0" "Date\0Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:32:21 -0700\0" - "To\0Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley@gmail.com>\0" - "Cc\0SE-Linux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>" - " tresys <refpolicy@oss1.tresys.com>\0" - "\01:1\0" + "To\0refpolicy@oss.tresys.com\0" + "\00:1\0" "b\0" " On 10/12/2010 04:39 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:\n" "> Looks like the previously discussed flex bug, e.g.:\n" @@ -38,58 +36,11 @@ "bad commit\n" "more lengthy...\n" "\n" - Justin P. Mattock - "\01:2\0" - "b\0" - "<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN\">\n" - "<html>\n" - " <head>\n" - " <meta content=\"text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1\"\n" - " http-equiv=\"Content-Type\">\n" - " </head>\n" - " <body bgcolor=\"#ffffff\" text=\"#000000\">\n" - " On 10/12/2010 04:39 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:\n" - " <blockquote\n" - " cite=\"mid:AANLkTi=RFa1UkhfHuq_dUUYaNaPD1yWnDwRQ+wZ8p-C_@mail.gmail.com\"\n" - " type=\"cite\">\n" - " <pre wrap=\"\">Looks like the previously discussed flex bug, e.g.:\n" - "<a class=\"moz-txt-link-freetext\" href=\"http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=126763385807985&w=2\">http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=126763385807985&w=2</a>\n" + "Justin P. Mattock\n" + "\n" "\n" - "</pre>\n" - " </blockquote>\n" - " <br>\n" - " <small>yeah I was thinking this as well.. from what it seems this is\n" - " hitting with the<br>\n" - " packages provided by suse, as well as the userspace packages. but\n" - " unlike<br>\n" - " my other system that was hitting this, the error is with building\n" - " a module, instead of building<br>\n" - " the policy.(as a workaround I would throw in an older version of\n" - " flex, then build only<br>\n" - " checkpolicy/module to get it working..(or if I was too lazy just\n" - " copy a version that<br>\n" - " works over to the other machine)).<br>\n" - " <br>\n" - " I can go through this today and see what I get.. one thing I\n" - " noticed with the packages<br>\n" - " from suse(11.4) is, policycoreutils is older than same of the\n" - " newer packages they have,<br>\n" - " causing other errors with python i.e. seinfo not found kind of\n" - " error.<br>\n" - " <br>\n" - " As for flex itself.. I do remember starting a bisect on that\n" - " package, but then realized<br>\n" - " that from version 2.34(if I remember correctly) to 2.35 theirs\n" - " just a few patches that<br>\n" - " are rather lengthy, making a bisect possible, but then going\n" - " through the bad commit<br>\n" - " more lengthy...<br>\n" - " <br>\n" - " Justin P. Mattock<br>\n" - " <br>\n" - " <br>\n" - " </small>\n" - " </body>\n" - "</html>\n" + "-------------- next part --------------\n" + "An HTML attachment was scrubbed...\n" + URL: http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20101012/46fd43a0/attachment.html -9e2573eb16d55934dfbf6036e147427e41d0b51fcf2e983681d3b538237acdc8 +742bb3c47c63e0f147b712afd7b47fffb9cad3bd5ebed63c9e0fb162af615c1d
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.