From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Add -fpic relocation support
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:05:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB57645.20505@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF81E331B4.05D83D55-ONC12577BB.002606C6-C12577BB.00272495@transmode.se>
Le 13/10/2010 09:07, Joakim Tjernlund a ?crit :
> Did you use -msingle-pic-base too with -fpic/-fPIC? This is what makes
> a difference(together with -fpic). The most interesting size is
> the total flash size IMHO. Reducing insn's in RAM at the expense
> of flash is not what most users need I think.
Yes, I did use -msingle-pic-base -- actually, I am the one who submitted
the patch for ARM to that effect, precisely after all my tests :) -- but
the code growth I am talking about is accesses, not setup.
>> This simply implies that -fPIC is a better choice for PPC (and hence
>> -mrelocatable) while -fpie is a better one for ARM.
>
> -fPIC isn't optimal(it is bigger) but until my gcc patch gets into
> gcc one cannot use -fpic(it gets promoted to -fPIC by gcc).
> -fpic is smaller but one cannot build apps has has a GOT over 32KB with
> that
You get a GOT over 32 KiB? IIRC, the reloc tables for ARM with -pie are
slightly below 19 KiB for a typical u-boot; I'm surprised that a GOT
would go bigger than the ELF table for the same work.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-13 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 12:38 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Add -fpic relocation support Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 12:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-12 13:04 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 13:47 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-12 14:10 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 17:31 ` Kim Phillips
2010-10-12 17:38 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12 17:41 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 18:19 ` Kim Phillips
2010-10-12 18:25 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12 18:38 ` Kim Phillips
2010-10-12 19:09 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 19:17 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 19:54 ` Kim Phillips
2010-10-12 21:23 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 21:30 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-13 9:44 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 19:13 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 19:20 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12 19:51 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 20:16 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12 20:40 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 20:48 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12 21:06 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 15:52 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12 17:11 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 17:41 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-12 18:11 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 20:37 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-12 21:00 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-13 6:30 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-13 7:07 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-13 9:05 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2010-10-13 9:34 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-13 21:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-14 6:25 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-13 7:21 ` J. William Campbell
2010-10-13 8:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-12 17:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-13 9:41 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv2] " Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-13 21:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv3] " Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-20 6:32 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-28 8:46 ` Joakim Tjernlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB57645.20505@free.fr \
--to=albert.aribaud@free.fr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.