From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ew0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P60EL-0005ve-2Q for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:14:50 +0200 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so1562859ewy.6 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:14:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qB9ba8LVMAXAqNu/vNM17Oex1NE7Q5y+DpbXgSEDyk4=; b=MP1/kcmjutStsRnKKNKtwQQ95/PeOcXS/s/rcd0hrZeNzwfguQof4i5pv0wC7vr+9d kwszjlNpXpYA4GQsGVOKTYoHLfp+VxGHyTe4bbY/dN1TPAE5JJ7NDJSJkUQEzot1efcr n9Sw+D1rOX6S5wB1VZez6coT/pfnT4RuSXbR8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=u83YRRNSU6ztD9V8djKILasMmv3eVvAOPcwHuTHZSGbYI15AMw3BZa9hizQvCqHtNp pKN15LB8JiKT3TWmjjmJ62JJg+lTUR0vj+8m7O+UAxZ3IfPMCQAeU2/5Dr9MDnW6fxh1 TnE5By77HvRaDljQdd+EDoLc6Oa7k6J7VxCtE= Received: by 10.14.53.65 with SMTP id f41mr5209361eec.18.1286972062419; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:14:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.40] (147.84-49-231.nextgentel.com [84.49.231.147]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q51sm872378eeh.16.2010.10.13.05.14.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:14:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CB5A2D2.4050702@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:15:14 +0200 From: Tasslehoff Kjappfot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4CB591B3.6080805@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CB591B3.6080805@gmail.com> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.215.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tasskjapp@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: libusb-1.0-0, Required build target 'myrootfs' has no buildable providers. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:14:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/13/2010 01:02 PM, Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote: > I'm compiling myrootfs for the beagleboard, and have IMAGE_INSTALL += > "libusb1" in my recipe. This has worked fine until a recent update, > but now it fails with the following: > > NOTE: Handling BitBake files: | (7156/7156) [100 %] > Parsing of 7156 .bb files complete (6694 cached, 462 parsed). 7374 > targets, 305 skipped, 0 masked, 0 errors. > ERROR: > '['/home/tassloe/src/openembedded/pd-recipes/images/myrootfs.bb']' > RDEPENDS/RRECOMMENDS or otherwise requires the runtime entity > 'libusb-1.0-0' but it wasn't found in any PACKAGE or RPROVIDES variables > ERROR: Required build target 'myrootfs' has no buildable providers. > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['myrootfs', 'libusb-1.0-0'] > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies > ERROR: > '['/home/tassle/src/openembedded/pd-recipes/images/myrootfs.bb']' > RDEPENDS/RRECOMMENDS or otherwise requires the runtime entity > 'libusb-1.0-0' but it wasn't found in any PACKAGE or RPROVIDES variables > Unknown Event: > NOTE: Runtime target 'libusb-1.0-0' is unbuildable, removing... > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['libusb-1.0-0'] > ERROR: Required build target 'myrootfs' has no buildable providers. > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['myrootfs', 'libusb-1.0-0'] > > I deleted my TMPDIR and then it compiled ok, but when I tried to > compile again, I got the same message. Neither myrootfs.bb nor > recipes/libusb have been changed since the last time this worked for > me, so I suspect something else is causing this. > > Any ideas? > > - Tasslehoff To add some info / reply to myself. koen told me this is because I try to force libs into my rootfs that I don't use directly, and removing libusb1 and libqt* from myrootfs.bb indeed makes it build. May have worked only be accident before, I'm not sure. But, it makes me wonder if I use SDK's right. To avoid everyone having to compile our rootfs with OE, I have created an SDK. Using this SDK I compile and link an application that needs libusb1, and that's why I had to force my rootfs to include it. The same for my Qt-application. I compile and link that one outside OE, and add libs to IMAGE_INSTALL in myrootfs.bb to make sure it has what it needs. Is this the wrong way to go about it? If so, how *should* I do it? Regards, Tasslehoff