From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
Subject: Re: D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:27:50 -0500
Message-ID: <4CB5CFF6.5000007@riverviewtech.net>
References: <20101013111252.603920lk59ex94ic@webmail.uni-bremen.de> <alpine.LNX.2.01.1010131201380.31123@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1010131201380.31123@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>

On 10/13/10 05:01, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> IPv6 was designed to do without NAT.

That doesn't negate the desire for it.



Grant. . . .