All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RFD: OF device tree vs. PHY flags.
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:18:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB89AD8.7020200@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)

I am in the process of planning a conversion of Octeon SOC platform code 
to use the OF device tree in the Linux kernel.

One issue that I have encountered, is that for some boards, we need to 
pass a non-zero flags argument to the phy_attach_direct() method.  The 
value of the flags is board dependent, so it would make some sense to 
encode its value in the device tree itself.  The flags I am interested 
in control the configuration of clocking modes and status LED connections.

I would suggest the following:

o Add a new property to "ethernet-phy" dts bindings called 
"linux,flags".  It would contain a comma separated string of flag names. 
  Something like "led-mode1,clock-mode2".  The semantics of the flag 
names would be interpreted by the PHY driver...

o Add a new function pointer to struct phy_driver: u32 
(*of_parse_flags)(struct phy_device *phydev).  This would parse and 
return the flags value for the "linux,flags" property from the 
device_node associated with the particular PHY device in question.

o Modify of_phy_connect() to do something like the following:

.
.
.
	if (phy->driver && phy->driver->of_parse_flags)
		flags |= phy->driver->of_parse_flags(phy);
.
.
.

o Perhaps add some helper functions to of_mdio.c to assist in parsing 
the "linux,flags" properties string.

o Any extra code in the PHY drivers and struct phy_driver would be 
protected by #ifdef CONFIG_OF

How does this sound?

Any suggestions as for improvements, or better names for things?


Thanks,
David Daney

             reply	other threads:[~2010-10-15 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-15 18:18 David Daney [this message]
2010-10-16  3:39 ` RFD: OF device tree vs. PHY flags Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CB89AD8.7020200@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.