From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RFD: OF device tree vs. PHY flags.
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:18:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB89AD8.7020200@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
I am in the process of planning a conversion of Octeon SOC platform code
to use the OF device tree in the Linux kernel.
One issue that I have encountered, is that for some boards, we need to
pass a non-zero flags argument to the phy_attach_direct() method. The
value of the flags is board dependent, so it would make some sense to
encode its value in the device tree itself. The flags I am interested
in control the configuration of clocking modes and status LED connections.
I would suggest the following:
o Add a new property to "ethernet-phy" dts bindings called
"linux,flags". It would contain a comma separated string of flag names.
Something like "led-mode1,clock-mode2". The semantics of the flag
names would be interpreted by the PHY driver...
o Add a new function pointer to struct phy_driver: u32
(*of_parse_flags)(struct phy_device *phydev). This would parse and
return the flags value for the "linux,flags" property from the
device_node associated with the particular PHY device in question.
o Modify of_phy_connect() to do something like the following:
.
.
.
if (phy->driver && phy->driver->of_parse_flags)
flags |= phy->driver->of_parse_flags(phy);
.
.
.
o Perhaps add some helper functions to of_mdio.c to assist in parsing
the "linux,flags" properties string.
o Any extra code in the PHY drivers and struct phy_driver would be
protected by #ifdef CONFIG_OF
How does this sound?
Any suggestions as for improvements, or better names for things?
Thanks,
David Daney
next reply other threads:[~2010-10-15 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-15 18:18 David Daney [this message]
2010-10-16 3:39 ` RFD: OF device tree vs. PHY flags Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB89AD8.7020200@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.