From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:55:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CBD871C.2080900@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101019114933.GA857@redhat.com>
On 2010-10-19 13:49, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:01:40PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2010-10-19 11:10, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> gcc 4.5 complains when compiling a recent rc with
>>>
>>> linux/block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ‘cfq_dispatch_requests’:
>>> linux/block/cfq-iosched.c:2156:3: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
>>>
>>> and it is right:
>>>
>>> slice = group_slice * count /
>>> max_t(unsigned, cfqg->busy_queues_avg[cfqd->serving_prio],
>>> cfq_group_busy_queues_wl(cfqd->serving_prio, cfqd, cfqg));
>>>
>>> busy_queues_avg can be indexed by this enum
>>>
>>> enum wl_prio_t {
>>> BE_WORKLOAD = 0,
>>> RT_WORKLOAD = 1,
>>> IDLE_WORKLOAD = 2,
>>> };
>>>
>>> in cfqd->serving_prio, but is only declared as
>>>
>>> unsigned int busy_queues_avg[2];
>>>
>>> which is clearly off by one. Fix this here.
>>
>> Indeed, that is definitely buggy. ->service_trees[][] looks buggy, too.
>> WTF?!
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> busy_queues_avg[] definitely looks buggy. Looks like I introduced this bug
> while converting corrado's logic to group logic. I will fix it in a while.
> Sorry for the goof up here.
>
> ->service_trees[][] is not buggy. We maintain workload subclassification
> only for RT and BE class. For IDLE class, there are no ASYNC_WORKLOAD,
> SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD or SYNC_WORKLOAD. All the type of idle queues
> go onto a separate service tree, service_tree_idle.
Right, that one looks convoluted (but correct). Ugh:
#define for_each_cfqg_st(cfqg, i, j, st) \
for (i = 0; i <= IDLE_WORKLOAD; i++) \
for (j = 0, st = i < IDLE_WORKLOAD ? &cfqg->service_trees[i][j]\
: &cfqg->service_tree_idle; \
(i < IDLE_WORKLOAD && j <= SYNC_WORKLOAD) || \
(i == IDLE_WORKLOAD && j == 0); \
j++, st = i < IDLE_WORKLOAD ? \
&cfqg->service_trees[i][j]: NULL) \
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-19 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-19 9:10 [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ Andi Kleen
2010-10-19 10:01 ` Jens Axboe
2010-10-19 11:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-10-19 11:55 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-10-19 12:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-10-19 13:23 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-19 15:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-10-21 16:53 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-10-21 17:16 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-21 17:15 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CBD871C.2080900@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.