From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sven Subject: Re: Xen dom0 crash: "d0:v0: unhandled page fault (ec=0000)" Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:01:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4CBDDD02.3000807@infinitumb.de> References: <19629.39326.337589.71778@wylie.me.uk> <1287498599.12843.2111.camel@qabil.uk.xensource.com> <4CBDB229.3030501@infinitumb.de> <1287503143.12843.2191.camel@qabil.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1287503143.12843.2191.camel@qabil.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/19/2010 05:45 PM, Gianni Tedesco wrote: > ditto, I suspected a known bug in my gcc version which broke xchg > because when I compiled with -O2 instead of -Os... the problem went away > but then something else bad happened later (I forget the details, and it > was too many config tweaks ago to get back to last time I had it working > that well) Like disabling "Optimize for size" in the config? Just tried, didn't make any difference. > it's clearly one of those fun and subtle bugs :( *sigh* :( Regards, Sven p.s.: someone let me know if i should keep everybody on cc!