From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
lenb@kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V1] cpuidle: add idle routine registration and cleanup pm_idle pointer
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:29:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CBF431C.3070002@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287602923.3673.1.camel@laptop>
On 10/20/2010 12:28 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 12:25 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> (the pm_idle is an x86 only problem. other architectures should be able
>> to keep doing what they are doing)
> sadly no, some architectures copied this brilliant piece of design.
>
> A quick git grep suggests:
> arm/blackfin/cris/ia64/m32r/m68knommu/microblaze/mn10300/sh/sparc all
> have pm_idle.
any of those that only every use one are the easy case.
the ones that use multiple can convert to the same solution x86 has over
time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-20 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-19 18:36 [RFC V1] cpuidle: add idle routine registration and cleanup pm_idle pointer Trinabh Gupta
2010-10-19 18:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-19 18:49 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-19 19:01 ` Trinabh Gupta
2010-10-20 15:12 ` Trinabh Gupta
2010-10-20 15:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-20 15:34 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-20 16:03 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-20 19:19 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-10-20 19:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-20 19:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 19:29 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2010-10-20 19:40 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-10-20 19:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-20 19:47 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-20 20:03 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-10-20 20:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-10-20 21:19 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-20 20:55 ` Dipankar Sarma
2010-10-20 15:57 ` Trinabh Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CBF431C.3070002@linux.intel.com \
--to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=trinabh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.