From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Redirect mirrored traffic to userspace app. [RESOLVED]
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:11:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC0824D.6030403@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=s9LAzk909QAjvhQKUVrn5bC+tgK6n2cfjyvY2@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/21/10 12:56, Mateus Caruccio wrote:
> As I said, I do not have access/permission to run anything in our
> production servers (our admins are a "little" paranoid :) Also, since
> port mirror is mirroring only those specific proto:port packets, I
> dont think that would cause any performance penalty.
(I've not used SPAN / port mirroring in a long time.) Does the SPAN
truly mirror select protocols (UDP) to a given port (2077)? Or does
SPAN mirror all traffic to the switch port?
*chuckle*
I've been on both sides of the paranoia. Usually it's warranted for
security / stability. (Usually)
> Anyway, this is not beautiful as it could, but works for our needs.
> Again, thanks for support. I will keep looking for a more
> straight/clean solution.
Honestly, I don't think this solution is that unclean, at least from a
host point of view. The only dirty part of this I see is the fact that
you have an IP / MAC duplication on the network. However, said
duplication is isolated by a SPAN configuration in a switch. So, it's
not really bad, just something to be mindful of.
I don't know how temporary your dev server is, but I've had 5+ year old
temp installs break when the prod server was replaced, thus changing the
MAC address. Just something else to be mindful of.
> I'm not a protocol/kernel specialist, so this is a good challenge.
Challenges can be fun and frustrating.
Grant. . . .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-21 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-21 16:42 Redirect mirrored traffic to userspace app. [RESOLVED] Mateus Caruccio
2010-10-21 17:32 ` Grant Taylor
2010-10-21 17:46 ` Mateus Caruccio
2010-10-21 17:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-21 17:56 ` Mateus Caruccio
2010-10-21 18:11 ` Grant Taylor [this message]
2010-10-21 18:18 ` Mateus Caruccio
2010-10-26 11:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-21 18:03 ` Grant Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC0824D.6030403@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.