From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38884 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9Ckc-0001z3-Lk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:13:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9CdR-0007MM-0I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:05:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52880) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9CdQ-0007M5-Pj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:05:56 -0400 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9M85t89003722 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:05:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4CC145E1.3000206@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:05:53 +0200 From: Jes Sorensen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 0/4] Introduce strtosz and make use of it References: <1287674149-25418-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/22/10 09:59, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com writes: >> From: Jes Sorensen >> This patch introduces cutils.c: strtosz() and gets rid of the >> multiple custom hacks for parsing byte sizes. In addition it adds >> supports for specifying human style sizes such as 1.5G. Last it >> eliminates the horrible abuse of a float to store the byte size for >> migrate_set_speed in the monitor. >> >> Note, this is tested on Linux and build tested for win32 using >> mingw32. >> >> v9: I worked through a couple of revisions directly with Markus and I >> think I got it right finally. > > I'd prefer to have strtosz() to match strtol() & friends and not > restrict suffixes. But this code does what it claims to do, as far as I > can see, so: > > ACK series Thanks! I thought about this a fair bit and I believe doing the full test in the function is the most valuable. It's a personal preference obviously. I think it's a win to do it here since it simplifies the caller code. Would be great to get this applied so I can get it off my plate :) Cheers, Jes